| Feb. 22, 2007: I intend to start posting fairly often here at |
Recent posts: |
First posted on Monday, December 13, 2010
Methods of inquiry
Recentest significant change: December 30, 2010.
Charles Sanders Peirce defined inquiry as any struggle to move from troublesome doubt to a secure belief, and outlined four methods.
The following bulleted paragraphs are taken mostly from the summary that I wrote at Wikipedia in various articles there:
Thus the familiar force/fraud twofold becomes a fourfold, on the pattern of other fours.
Recentest significant change: December 30, 2010.
Charles Sanders Peirce defined inquiry as any struggle to move from troublesome doubt to a secure belief, and outlined four methods.
| See "The Fixation of Belief" (1877): via peirce.org; via Arisbe; via Google |
- The method of tenacity (policy of sticking to initial belief) — which brings comforts and decisiveness but leads to trying to ignore contrary information and others' views as if truth were intrinsically private, not public. The method goes against the social impulse and easily falters since one may well notice when another's opinion seems as good as one's own initial opinion. Its successes can be brilliant but tend to be transitory.
- The method of authority — which overcomes disagreements but sometimes brutally. Its successes can be majestic and long-lived, but it cannot regulate people thoroughly enough to withstand doubts indefinitely, especially when people learn about other societies present and past.
- The method of congruity or the a priori or the dilettante or "what is agreeable to reason" — which promotes conformity less brutally, but depends on taste and fashion in paradigms and can go in circles over time, along with barren disputation. It is more intellectual and respectable but, like the first two methods, sustains capricious and accidental beliefs, destining some minds to doubts.
- The method of science — the method wherein inquiry supposes a discoverable reality independent of particular opinion — the method, then, wherein inquiry can, by its own account, go wrong (fallibilism) as well as right and thus purposely tests itself and criticizes, corrects, and improves itself. No destined doubts of the scientific method as such arise from its practice.
| Inquiry method: | Applying it to oneself, to others, consciously or unconsciously: |
| Method of authority, power, coercion. | Power-enhancing belief. Joining or submitting to the power in order to be powerful. Recruiting or coercing others. |
| Method of wealth, means, the "financial method." | Affluent belief. Seeking, taking, or offering, giving the bribe, the funding, etc. Extortion from opponents. |
| Method of fashion, wattage, opulence. | Fashionable belief. Manipulating oneself. Seeking to be manipulated, seduced. Manipulating and luring others. Rhetoric in the bad sense. Manipulative taunting and ridicule of opponents. |
| Method of status, standing. | Status-enhancing belief. Deceiving oneself. Cocksureness. Sophistry. Seeking to be deceived and to deceive others. Fraud. Fraudulant demotion of opponents to low status and obscurity. |
Thus the familiar force/fraud twofold becomes a fourfold, on the pattern of other fours.
| | Wrongs. | Causal terms of intelligent beings. | Realms of nature. | Tetrazed principles of the Four Causes. |
| 1. | Force (coercion). | Will. | Forces. | Agent. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2. | Corruption (bribery, etc.) | Ability. | Matter. | Bearer. |
| 3. | Manipulation (luring, incitement, lulling). | Affectivity. | Life. | Act. |
| 4. | Fraud. | Cognition. | Mind. | Borne. |
. . . . |



